The Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies is appointed by, and serves at the pleasure of the EECS Department Chair and is responsible for managing, coordinating and administering all undergraduate degree programs in the EECS Department. This position also includes the following responsibilities:
The Associate Chair for Graduate Studies is appointed by, and serves at the pleasure of the EECS Department Chair and is responsible for managing, coordinating and administering all graduate degree programs in the EECS Department. This position also incudes the following responsibilities:
The Associate Chair for Edwards Campus Programs is appointed by, and serves at the pleasure of the EECS Department Chair and is responsible for managing, coordinating and administering all Departmental degree programs that are delivered at the Edwards Campus in Overland Park. This position also includes the following responsibilities:
V. Faculty Evaluation and Promotion
A. Expectations for Tenure and Promotion
The Department’s performance standards for tenure and promotion to Associate Professor and Professor are contained within the EECS Department Faculty Evaluation Plan, which is approved every year by the EECS faculty and is available from the Department Chair’s administrative assistant.
B. The Path to Tenure and Promotion
The path to tenure and promotion begins with the department. A mentor (for Assistant Professors) or an advocate (for Associate Professors) is assigned to help the candidate prepare the promotion package. For Assistant Professors, the mentor guides the faculty member towards the tenure point, providing advice and feedback. Each year the untenured candidate will receive feedback from the Untenured Faculty (UTF) Committee via the Department Chair. During the 3rd year of employment the untenured candidate will undergo the Progress To Tenure Review (PTTR), which requires the results of the annual evaluation by the UTF to be reported to the SoE Dean and then to the Provost.
No later than the 6th year of employment, the untenured candidate formally submits the promotion package to the EECS faculty. Associate Professors seeking promotion are not constrained by a time limit within which they must submit their package for promotion. An Associate Professor’s promotion package may be submitted for consideration when the faculty member and advocate both agree that promotion is appropriate.
At an appropriate time during the fall semester, the Promotion and Tenure Committee as defined below meets to evaluate the untenured candidate’s package and submit a vote to endorse or oppose a recommendation for tenure and/or promotion. Candidates for Professor will be evaluated only by the Professors in the Department. At that meeting, the faculty member’s mentor or advocate presents the case for tenure/promotion and leads the faculty discussion. The faculty recommendation is sent to the Chair who endorses or opposes the faculty’s recommendation. The recommendation of the faculty and the chair are then forwarded to the School of Engineering. These activities constitute the initial review.
The intermediate review is conducted by the School of Engineering Tenure and Promotion Committee. This committee examines the packages of all faculty candidates for promotion/tenure in the School and provides recommendations to the Dean. The Dean endorses – either favorably or unfavorably – the recommendation of the School P&T Committee and forwards the candidate’s package, the results of the initial review and the results of the School review to the Provost.
The final review is conducted by the University Committee for Promotion and Tenure (UCPT). This committee reviews the candidate’s promotion packages and recommends an appropriate tenure/promotion decision to the Provost, who serves as the chair of the UCPT Committee. The Provost’s tenure/promotion recommendation is forwarded to the Chancellor and then finally to the Kansas Board of Regents.
C. Annual Faculty Evaluations
In the spring semester of each year, faculty evaluations are conducted according to the EECS Department Faculty Evaluation Plan. All faculty members submit Faculty Activity Reports that describe their accomplishments in the three primary areas of responsibility – research, teaching and service.
D. EECS Post-tenure Review
Tenured EECS faculty will be reviewed using the process defined in the EECS Post-tenure Review Policy.
E. Differential Workload Assignment
As part of the evaluation process the Department Chair and the faculty member being evaluated mutually agree on an appropriate distribution of workload. The default distribution of workload is 40% research, 40% teaching and 20% service. These percentages can be adjusted to recognize a faculty member’s desire to adjust his or her effort to focus more on research or teaching, for example. The differential workload assignment determines the faculty member’s teaching load for the upcoming academic year.
F. Allocation of Pay Raises
Assigning pay raises based on merit is the responsibility of the Department Chair. Eligibility requirements for a merit raise are determined by the School of Engineering Dean and the Department of Human Resources. The School of Engineering requires that a current Faculty Activity Report be on file in order for a faculty member to be eligible for a merit raise.
VI. Department Committees
Standing Committees provide a venue for Department Faculty to exchange information between faculty and the administration of the department, and to communicate information to the Dean. These committees may recommend the use of physical resources, approve purchases, and establish policies and practices.
Unless stated otherwise, all members of a committee have voting rights within that committee. Typical committee votes define committee recommendations that will advance to the full Department faculty for a final vote (e.g. a proposal to add a new elective course to the curriculum.). Standing committees are those that address the ongoing activities of the Department. The Chair will form ad hoc committees to address needs of a more immediate and temporary nature, such as new faculty hires.
The Chair will designate chairpersons for each standing committee. Committee compositions will be determined based on faculty interests to the maximum extent possible. Committee membership may be ongoing, unless a faculty member requests to shift his or her participation to a different committee.
The following is a list of EECS Department Standing Committees:
A. Accreditation Committee
The Accreditation Committee is responsible for preparing the Department’s accredited undergraduate degree programs for periodic accreditation review. This committee is chaired by the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies.
B. Class Scheduling Committee
The Class Scheduling Committee assigns faculty members to classes according to the workload guidelines provided by the Chair. The committee is chaired by the Department Chair, with one member from the faculty who primarily teaches courses required by CSCoE majors, one member from the faculty who primarily teaches courses required by EE majors and the faculty member appointed by the Department Chair who serves as the departmental course scheduling officer.
C. Equipment Committee
The Equipment Committee approves expenditure of Department funds for laboratory equipment and supplies that support the academic laboratories. Membership should be composed of faculty members who are directly involved in one or more of the Department’s academic laboratories.
D. Faculty Awards Committee
The Faculty Awards Committee nominates deserving faculty for awards sponsored by the School of Engineering, the University, and external organizations. The nomination process may include preparing packages with supporting information, including requesting letters from outside sources.
E. Student Awards Committee
The Student Awards Committee nominates deserving students to receive departmental honors that will be awarded at the EECS Awards Banquet at the end of the Spring semester. This committee works closely with the Undergraduate and Graduate Program Assistants to identify students for these awards.
F. Graduate Studies Committee
The Graduate Studies Committee is chaired by the Associate Chair for Graduate Studies. The purpose of this committee is to screen applicants for the EECS graduate program, approve waivers and other requests from students, and to assist the Associate Chair with recruiting and the administration of the graduate program.
G. Undergraduate Studies Committee
The Undergraduate Studies Committee is chaired by the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies. The purpose of this committee is to deal with issues pertaining to the Department’s undergraduate program, approve waivers and other requests from students, and to assist the Associate Chair with the administration of the graduate program.
H. Untenured Faculty Review Committee
The Untenured Faculty Review Committee is responsible for the annual evaluation of untenured faculty. The purpose of this evaluation is to provide the faculty member with feedback on progress toward tenure. Suggestions may be made to the faculty member and recommendations may be made to the Department Chair concerning the faculty member’s teaching schedule, committee assignments and other information to help the faculty member achieve tenure and promotion to Associate Professor. The Department Chair will communicate a summary of their annual evaluation to the untenured faculty member under review.
I. Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Committee
The Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Committee is responsible for writing, administering and grading the annual doctoral qualifying exam to graduate students in the Spring semester. This committee consists of at least one faculty member from each the major research areas within the department.
J. Promotion and Tenure Committee
The Promotion and Tenure Committee consists of all faculty member of higher rank than a faculty candidate who is presented for promotion or tenure. The committee is chaired by the Department Chair, and advocates/mentors of the faculty candidates for promotion present their case to the appropriate group of faculty – Associate Professors and Professors for candidates for tenure and promotion to Associate Professor; and Professors for candidates seeking promotion to Professor.
K. Scholarship Committee
The Scholarship Committee is responsible for awarding scholarships to eligible EECS students based upon criteria specified by the School, the University or the donor of the scholarship funds.
L. Post-tenure Review Committee
The Post-tenure Review Committee is responsible for conducting the Post-tenure Review according to the EECS Post-tenure Review Policy. EECS Post-tenure Review Policy describes the committee selection process.
VII. Amendments to the EECS Department Bylaws
These bylaws are subject to change as needed to support the best interests of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Any Department faculty member may propose an amendment to the bylaws. The Chair will circulate proposed amendments to all Department faculty members at least two weeks in advance of any meeting for a vote on said amendments. The Department Faculty shall approve, modify, or reject any proposed amendments to these bylaws by majority vote of a quorum of assembled faculty members.
CONTACT:
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
2001 Eaton Hall
1520 West 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045
785-864-4620
APPROVED BY:
Engineering Senate Executive Committee
APPROVED ON:
2015-04-10
EFFECTIVE ON:
2015-04-10
REVIEW CYCLE:
Annual (As Needed)
CHANGE HISTORY:
04/07/2025: Migration to TeamDynamix from Drupal.
08/02/2024: Converted PDF Policy Statement to a live text Policy Statement.
10/28/2021: Uploaded accessible document.
08/25/2021: Updated contact section.
04/16/2015: Added to the KU Policy Library.
04/10/2015: Approved by the Engineering Senate Executive Committee.