Search9 Results

To outline the process used by University Support Staff (USS) to appeal an overall rating of unsatisfactory on a performance evaluation. 

Interpretation of, or Conflict among, Various Governance DocumentsOn 10/6/94, the University Council approved the following procedure for interpretation of, or conflict among, the University Senate Code, University Senate Rules and Regulations, Faculty Senate Rules and Regulations, the Handbook for Faculty and Unclassified Staff, and the Student Senate Rules and Regulations: Contact the Office of University Governance, 864-5169, or via e-mail at govern@ku.edu, with questions about conflict or in

To provide requirements for the formal process of evaluating the performance of Unclassified Professional Staff (UPS) and University Support Staff (USS). 

To outline the process used by Unclassified Professional Staff (UPS) to appeal an overall rating of unsatisfactory on a performance evaluation. 

It is the purpose of this document to promote the rigorous and fair evaluation of faculty performance during the promotion and tenure process by (a) establishing criteria that express the Libraries’ expectations for meeting University standards in terms of disciplinary practices; (b) providing procedures for evaluation of professional performance, scholarship, and service (c) preserving and enhancing the participatory rights of candidates, including the basic right to be informed about critical

Subject to yearly review, office space in the Student Involvement and Leadership Center (SILC) has been assigned for usage to student organizations. Upon review of the submissions, the SILC Director will present an assignment plan to the Organization Space Committee for approval. The information on the application form will be used for evaluating requests and assigning space in a manner consistent with the goals of the University of Kansas.

To outline the review and approval process for executing (signing) contracts on behalf of the University. 

This policy describes procedures for the regular review of University Research Centers.

To specify the standards and criteria to be referenced by members of the UCPT in the performance of their duties, as well as to outline the review procedures, timeline, and confidentiality expectations for the committee.